Part 1: Bottom-up and Top-Down forecasting - Introduction

In demand planning terminology, Forecast Reconciliation is also referred to as Bottom-up and Top-down Forecasting or Proportional Forecasting. Forecast Reconciliation, however, could also stand for reconciling the demand forecast with a modeled forecast vs. a judgmental forecast or a financial forecast.

In this article, we will be reconciling a top-down forecast and Bottom-up forecast through aggregation and disaggregation methodology. The second title is more direct in referring to this process as “Bottom-up/Top-Down forecasting”, but we may also call it “Proportional forecasting” since this method involves using proportions to develop the disaggregated detail level forecasts into the future.

Adding more excitement to this menu of terminology, different software tools have different methodologies to perform forecast reconciliation between the different levels of forecast. Typically, forecast reconciliation is sought after in cases where you need to forecast multiple levels of the product hierarchy, so in some sense it’s aligned with product grouping and product hierarchy. If you are also forecasting at the customer level, then the levels of aggregation multiply by the customer dimension. Customers may roll up into a sales territory, sales district, and sales region to the national level. In this article, we are going to limit ourselves to illustrating forecast aggregation and disaggregation just using the product hierarchy. We would abstract away from further disaggregation at the customer SKU level.

When you develop your forecasting process, you have a choice to make – at what level do you develop the forecast? You could forecast at SKU level or slightly higher (at brand or sub-brand level) or, given a simpler supply chain you could get away with forecasting at the category or division level. Continue Reading